Logo
Quick Search: Music,Videos,Groups,Names... Anything
People Search
Personality Search 
Posted: Wednesday 29 September 2021 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]

alt


Another illustration is PvP and OSRS GP PK related changes which are voted against. Individuals even voted against letting pures wear chaps, despite already being able to wear the normal variants. The effect of the to accounts would have been to marginally increase the need and therefore improve profits from hint scrolls. This isn't an illustration of polling fulfilling the interests of Runescape, it is just a meme of not enjoying pures. If we only see updates which match the same 75 percent of people every time the remaining 25 percent become increasingly marginalised, which isn't a good balance when people 75/25 are seemingly so frequently the same individuals.

Not everyone will make sound decisions while voting, or make the"right" choice. If literally everyone made the most educated voting options. The United States wouldn't have. Nothing longer, real world example of unemployment. Our voting system isn't perfect, but its all we have to make sure we do not wind up with the garbage that got pushed RS3 players down. Our throats. There are unquestionably improves that could be made that don't endanger it though (which are not being done or tried ).

What will kill and destroy this game and its own integrity is this system's disregard that jagex is trying to push for more of, as evident with this poll and has been doing. Then they'd not have unclear and confusing wording in polls Additionally if jagex appeared as much as they say they do about it. Its a thing that is consistent too. You'd think it would get evidence read or something. Not even bare minimum work.

I am certainly not advocating to ignore or abolish the polling system and it's a tool in holding the devs. On the flip side, the polling system doesn't function effectively and necessitates improvements or flexibility to meet the requirements of their player base. When 99% of articles is left to decide, I can not agree with all the exaggeration in your article about the constant disregard of polled items. It is essential to note that the events when Jagex have felt they had to diverge in the polled outcome, it was because they felt compelled to by the issues together with the voting system itself.

The VLS addition is a recent and clear example of the: Jagex poll several minor PvP changes/updates that don't pass and do not believe the community are currently evaluating the content on merit. This means Jagex take that PvP buffs/content won't ever pass polls or perform them. Polls either have to be a) pitched to people who actively engage in or understand the appropriate content, b) taken as strong advisement rather than gospel( c) lower threshold, or d) simply make more integrity adjustments.

This is 100% authentic for runescape 3 gold every single game's player base. While occasionally a developer has overlooked something significant and players may assist thembecause it's the players that play Runescape--that the participant base frequently makes quite stupid decisions because they don't really spend much time considering what a change could do, they do not have some development experience, and they are often quite self-interested. In the instance of all OSRS, the players have completely vetoed bad thoughts multiple occasions before, however they also have vetoed great ideas, and also the absolute dumbest ideas generally aren't the items that get polled, they're the things that have indicated and upvoted right here on the subreddit.
 

Posted: Monday 27 September 2021 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]

alt





Hello, we're EA Sports. We'd like to Mut 22 coins sit down and talk. Derrick Henry was rated 96 in Madden NFL 22, and on behalf of all Tennessee Titans fans, we've had a bone to play with you.

Christian McCaffrey, a rival running back for the Panthers, wins most coveted running back accolades. He holds a 97 rating which is ridiculous given his injury-plagued 2020 season. CMC only appeared in three games during the season. He still ran for 225 yards and scored five touchdowns, however, it was only three games. Talk about a tiny sample size.

Henry played in 16 out of 16 games. He was also the league's leader in rushing attempts (378) and yards running (2,027) and touchdowns (17), as well as touches (397) and yards from the line of scrimmage (2,141). Henry is the top running back in the league over during the past two seasons. CMC which included.

Even in his top seasons, McCaffrey had fewer total yards, fewer yards for each run, and had fewer touchdowns than Derrick Henry did in 2020. Henry has the best chance to win the rushing title the following season.

Simply stated, McCaffrey is not ahead of Henry next year because there isn't any objective measure. McCaffrey's injury should actually be seen as a negative.

Titans' Derrick Henry tied for the second-highest RB rating in Madden NFL 22
The sole reason we can think of as to why McCaffrey is still the at the top of the running back field (according to games played on video) is that he's an better receiver than Henry is (2,672 receiving yards, however, what do you think?). He's got great hands Sure but, as far as Titans fans are concerned that's all the stats that CMC outdoes Henry in. EA Sports directors were sane enough to not award McCaffrey's 99-percent rating this season.

But while we're on the issue, why hasn't Henry joined the 99 Club yet? Henry's Madden 22 rating has increased three points higher than last year. But why is it not adding more?

Rating him below an injured McCaffrey is one thing, but Henry has achieved more than enough to increase his star status.

Membership to the exclusive 99 Club has been recently granted to Travis Kelce, Aaron Donald and Davante Adams. however, after Henry's incredible season, he deserves a golden ticket, too.

As for the other backs: Nick Chubbs Madden 22 coins for sale ties Henry to finish second. Dalvin Cook and Alvin Kamara round out the remaining top five at 95 and 94respectively.

 

Posted: Friday 24 September 2021 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]

 

 

alt



The online participant who qualifies Nba 2k22 Mt will be able to play in a 3-on-3 tournament alongside influencers Troydan and PoorBoySin at the second annual NBA 2KL Three for All Showdown competition. It will be held starting on April 9th, 2015 from 5:00 pm Pacific Time / Saturday, April 10, at 8:00 PM Eastern Time on the NBA 2K League Twitch and YouTube channels. It's a thrilling opportunity to participate in the NBA 2KL Three for All Showdown, which will feature NBA 2K League as well as WNBA players, as and social media influencers playing in "The City" mode for a shot at the $25,000 USD prize pot!

While the PlayStation Three for All Showdown Qualifier online competition is available to PS5 players in the United States only, we are able to offer a variety of NBA 2K21 online tournaments coming to PS4 and PS5 very soon . They will be available to our players from regions all around the world. We're looking forward to sharing more on this soon! How does NBA 2K decide the ratings of rookies? We asked the game's developers.

One of the most exciting occasions for a rookie professional basketball player is when they learn their NBA 2K ratings. HoopsHype talked to Mike Stauffer, who serves as producer on the development side of the video game, to know more about the procedure. His group works closely with the game play staff to determine the official ratings for all NBA players. (Obsessive gamers who play the MyLeague mode in the game may be able to recognize Stauffer as one of the computer-generated heads coaches hired by franchises when simulating the offseason.)

The developers were faced with a difficult task in assessing the new rookie class this year. Many of the top prospects have experienced a different path towards the NBA. The Golden State Warriors selected James Wiseman with the no. 2 overall pick in the 2020 NBA draft even though, due to issues with eligibility, he played just three collegiate games. LaMelo was the first. one pick. The Charlotte Hornets drafted LaMelo Ball at No. 3.

Stauffer declared "Every rating is 2k22 mt an estimate and if there's a lack of data, it'll be difficult to create accurate predictions." "Even general managers and coaches find it difficult to decide on the best player is to choose to draft."
 

Posted: Wednesday 8 September 2021 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Cheap OSRS Gold, RS 2007 Gold & RS3 Gold For Sale | RSorder.

alt


Frankly, this really is 100% true for OSRS GP every single game's player base. While sometimes a developer has overlooked something significant and players may help thembecause it is the players that actually play Runescape--the player base often makes really stupid decisions because they do not really spend much time considering what a change might do, they don't have any development experience, and they are often quite self-interested. In the instance of OSRS, the players have absolutely vetoed bad ideas multiple occasions before, however they also have vetoed great thoughts, and the absolute dumbest ideas aren't the things that make polled, they are the things which get suggested and upvoted right on the subreddit.

I think way also. But I don't mind the thought of providing more control to the OSRS team. Because besides PvP stuff, and some dividing upgrades like a skill that is new. I feel like they have a lot of freedom to style content. It isn't like everything they poll gets taken down. Like if they polled DT2, menaphos and raids 3 tomorrow it would all pass without it even being close. Seems like more of a reason to keep the polling system to me. Will pass. The updates a great portion of the participant base dislike won't pass.

The other aspect is just because something neglects a poll doesn't mean it can't be reworked by them and repoll it later. What is great about scenarios like that is that they will get a lot of feedback and correct the content before adding it into Runescape. As someone said though a bunch of players will be marginalized for being Pkers or for wanting another skill. Eventually they will get jaded and leave Runescape, which I'm convinced Jagex doesn't want. I voted but with voting towards the groups gaining more power and Jagex that actively participate in it. As a pker and someone who enjoys pvp I think that is my only option.

Feedback is important. There are many cases of the OSRS team pitching an upgrade and the neighborhood basically reacting like"woah woah woah continue, did you consider this ___". Turns out jagex didn't consider mentioned thing, and the upgrade was better due to the community opinions (or wouldn't have been great w/o it). And these are long term jmods that are liked by the general and community know their good upgrades. They are still human and can not understand everything. In case the same upgrade were to happen in RS3, it would have gone without the chance of feedback, or just ignored (though we have had instances of ignored feedback in OSRS, see prif/crystal armour and bh2) along with the update would have stayed bad/dead/broken on arrival. So them and feedback is vital to OSRS.Perhaps they can present utensils kind of like the iron saliva in Runescape match, then tie it in to smithing. Hell, let's get a grill or BBQ going. It could be a fantastic incentive to a really use a fire you have made to cook rather than a range. A balance to it might be a burn chance. The food food for pvp would be balancing. Completely agree. I believe like most skills have different paths you can take (slow and cheap, expensive and fast) and a variety of methods. Runecrafting is indeed stagnate the xp rates are shithouse and never increase as you go higher in levels. Yeah bloods are afk but nevertheless demotivating to even get to 77 and just cease for your dairies.

I didn't say anything about new cheap OSRS gold updates being awful. They have done well with a lot. Hosidius growth is perhaps the best update we have ever had in that respect. What I dislike is that the idea of Jagex utilizing OSRS instead of timeline where they never screwed up RS2. I really don't believe Runescape in its current state is similar to that, but things might change. They never expected OSRS becoming the"main Runescape game" and polls like this one make me incredibly suspicious with exactly what they've been planning behind closed doors to the years ahead. I want to have the ability to play the Old School without worrying about the other fiasco that is RS3 that we have always known and loved. Eventually 1 day nobody will be able to play Runescape ever again. Sucks to think about.

 

Posted: Monday 6 September 2021 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Cheap OSRS Gold, RS 2007 Gold & RS3 Gold For Sale | RSorder.

alt




The VLS inclusion is a obvious and OSRS GP current example of the: Jagex poll numerous PvP changes/updates which don't pass and do not believe the community are evaluating the material on merit. This implies Jagex take that PvP buffs/content won't ever pass polls or do them. Polls either need to become a) pitched to people who actively participate in or understand that the appropriate content( b) taken as powerful advisement and not gospel, c) lower threshold, or d) simply earn more integrity changes.

Frankly, this really is 100% authentic for every single game's player base. While occasionally a developer has missed something important and players can help thembecause it is the players who play Runescape--the player base frequently makes really dumb decisions because they do not actually spend much time considering what a change might do, they don't have any development experience, and they are often quite self-interested. In the instance of OSRS, the players have absolutely vetoed bad thoughts multiple times before, however they have also vetoed great ideas, and the absolute dumbest ideas generally aren't the things that make polled, they're the things which get indicated and upvoted right on the subreddit.

I think way too. But I also don't mind the notion of providing the OSRS group control. Because besides PvP stuff, and some dividing updates like a new skill. I feel like that they have a good deal of freedom to design content anyway. It is not like everything they survey gets down shot. Like when they polled DT2, menaphos and raids it would all pass without it even being close. Sounds like more of a motive to keep the polling system. The upgrades that are generally enjoyed will pass. The upgrades a good portion of the participant base dislike will not pass.

Another thing is because something fails a poll does not mean they repoll it and can't rework it. What is great about scenarios like that is that they will find a lot of comments from players and adjust the content before adding it to Runescape. As somebody said then a bunch of players will be marginalized to be Pkers or for wanting another ability. Eventually they will become jaded and leave Runescape, which I am convinced Jagex does not want. I honestly voted but with voting towards the groups that actively participate in it and Jagex getting more power. As somebody and a pker who enjoys pvp I think that is my only alternative.

Feedback is vital. There are many rs gold 2007 instances of this OSRS team pitching an upgrade and the community basically responding like"woah woah woah continue, did you think about this ___". Turns out jagex didn't think about mentioned thing, and the upgrade was better due to this neighborhood opinions (or would not have been good w/o it). And these are the community long term jmods that are liked by the community and general know their upgrades that are good. They're still human and can't understand everything. In case the same update were to happen in RS3, it would have gone in without the prospect of opinions, or just ignored (though we've had cases of ignored comments in OSRS, watch prif/crystal armour and bh2) along with the update would have remained bad/dead/broken on arrival. So feedback and them acting and engaging on comments is essential to OSRS.Maybe they can introduce utensils kind of like the iron saliva in Runescape match, then tie it in to smithing. Hell, let's get a grill or BBQ going. It would be a fantastic incentive to some actually use. An equilibrium to it might be a burn chance. The food food for pvp is balancing. Completely agree. I feel like most abilities have different routes you can take (slow and cheap, expensive and fast) and many different methods. Runecrafting is stagnate the xp prices are shithouse and never grow as you go higher in levels. Yeah bloods are afk but nevertheless demotivating to even reach 77 and just stop at.
 

Posted: Thursday 2 September 2021 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Cheap OSRS Gold, RS 2007 Gold & RS3 Gold For Sale | RSorder.

alt



Biggest skill improvements readily Smithing OSRS GP and fletching. Crafting has super late game purpose with zenytes. Fletching has dragon darts and arrows I figure. Smithing has rune.make these skills useful for overdue game things. For me personally it was construction, despite getting my favorite rewards the training technique is awful to me and depends on aligned cameras etc.. For benefits, unquestionably fletching is up there. For methodology construction is up there I concur. I'd like to see world development construction. Like imagine you can improve how cities look (like burgh p rott activities ).

Even maybe as a profit idea. Just like you become assigned jobs around the cities to fix shit and you also get xp and an agency fee. Less xp/hr than the strategies that are current but really turning to. Agree. Development construction would be fantastic. Each area could have its own guild with projects to be constructed throughout the area. I would certainly be interested in experience as opposed to gain however.

For instance a project like creating a walkable bridge or NPC house could take 6-8 hours to finish granting reasonable experience rates during, and the town would cover all the source price. You could get paid a reasonable amount for the work but not a fantastic thing. Maybe you can receive rewards or perks for selecting contracts instead of payment. The main focus would have to be making it an adoptable training system for people working to a top building level, while still being rewarding to people who have 99 construction and beyond.

I'd appreciate an ending comments box (though I understand if that's hard to go through). I couldn't say I believed more could be worked by OSRS on articles. This was specially glaring on the"what would you think OSRS should concentrate on?" Section, where I had to pick stuff that I enjoy, but not actually what I believed the dev team should focus on. Also, I was intrigued about the HD OSRS screenshots. Glad to see they are looking into it. I used the improvement on in-game box towards the limit to voice something not related for fear that there would not be an additional box. There wasn't so that was a fantastic call. They could have used enter areas since there was a lot I'd have said but wasn't provided a location to.

Yes, I totally this. At every chance, I attempted to slip in more"untradeable/completionist articles", but the replies just could not reflect it completely. I would have liked a general remarks box at the end because there were several things I wanted to respond to in more detail but hadn't any place to achieve that. While completionist content wouldn't make it. I'm pretty bummed out that the completionist community could not express their opinions for sport direction. I was also happy to see the HD OSRS screenshots. They were rated by me as a optional toggle, because as my top. It'd make me even more excited to log in and get immersed.

If you do not feel comfortable with cheap OSRS gold Qualtrics I know but my experience let's me think it's fine. Let's say I answered this survey 100 who'd you imagine gets that info? After GDPR I have felt so pressured with every single site ever to track and monitor me it is disgusting, and even more disgusting that it was happening before without my understanding. Taking a look at the survey connection along with the basic disclosures in the bottom of the webpage it doesn't seem the Jagex is having a third-party firm so if the only men and women who would have direct access to your information are the survey programmers who can pull exports out of the database to disperse internally. EU also includes some fairly strong data privacy legislation that (at least my US based firm which frequently interacts with Qualtrics connections ) are followed pretty strictly from the survey developers and information hosting sites.